Does America attack to Iran?
These days in Iranian blogsphere is a discussion about possible attack to Iran ,there are many questions?
Does war is completely a dirty thing or is essential? If America attack to Iran what is duty of an Iranian? Does he must defend his country or must support Americans? and or go to underground of his home and hide? Do Americans bring freedom or bring a rebel country and al-Qaeda with themselves? And many other questions like these.
I really don’t like speak about this subject , so I don’t write my ideas about these question because if I participate in this discussion it’s mean that I agree with America and Bush’s right to do what ever they want?
It’s really strange suddenly Media make a stream and we go with that stream even that stream was only a lie.
-------------
link:Iranians for Peace
7 comments:
There will be no attack as it is only phyops. I personally don't want war with Iran, but if they build a nuclear weapon then we have no choice. It isn't like they haven't funded, equiped, trained, and directed terrorist groups to attack US troops and interests before.
While I voted for Bush I don't think he realizes to what extent he has alienated people. The pressure he is exerting for governments to make democratic reforms is counter-productive. He should just focus on working with Iraq, Afghanistan, and Palestine and let the rest of the muslim people see for themselves.
America does not want to go to war with Iran, but it isn't impossible that the USA will destroy nuclear facilities. Iraq has been hard because Arab nations dislike westerners, more specifically, Americans. It is not easy to protect people who can't decide if we or the terrorists are a greater threat. We hope to have the Iraqi military trained well-enough to protect themselves in a year or so. We hope to see Iraq standing on it's own in a free-market world.
Regardless of what those in the Middle East believes, the United States doesn't want to hurt anyone. We do believe that all people should be free and that women should be treated as equals. We think Iranians will eventually chose this for themselves.
The hope is that the desire for freedom will grow without any intervention, and Iran, Saudia Arabia, and Syria will all eventually want democracy for their people. We hope that a prosperous and free Iraq will spread the fire of democracy throughout the Middle East.
Don't worry. America will not attack Iran. The U.S. military is stretched way too thin, and Bush knows that the American people are growing more and more disgusted over the complete American failure in Iraq. Should he wage war in Iran, the American people, as well as Congress would begin motion for his impeachment. The American people do not war in Iran any more than the Iranians do. These are only idle threats. God Bless Iran and the Iranian People!
About half of Americans will support Bush no matter what he does. They apparently believe him to be guided by god, and therefore incapable of making mistakes. As long as someone else's kids are losing arms and legs in a foreign land, they feel as if they're personally doing something patriotic by "supporting" them with a Yellow Ribbon Magnet on their car.
The other half of us have no interest in policing the whole planet, and understand the danger involved in following a madman who wants America to do exactly that..
Iran will not be hit. The Bush admin. is convinced that if people determine their own destiny then peace will result in the long run. Attacking Iran is not on the agenda, but not for the reasons stated in the prior comments. Everyone on the inside knows that Iraq and Iran are very, very different.
S. Banks and the rooster are morons, you should ignore them.
The division within the U.S. is reflected in some of the comments above.
Bush will do what he wants to do without first using anything that simulates sound reasoning, and he will justify his military acts by using the marketing techniques that he used against Iraq: i.e., vilify Iran (or Syria or whoever is next), point to selected evidence that shows that the Iranian government is evil (without any perspective to all the other evils on the planet that we do not address with bombs), and then tell the CIA to find more evidence, firing anyone who says that Iranians are not evil.
Bush believes that God speaks to him and apparantly God is telling him to respond to people that he (Bush) doesn't like with violence, hatred, or disregard, and he procedes with disregard for law. He does this with his religious agenda in the U.S. (giving government money to religious organizations, anti-gay policy and other policies) and to his attacks in the Mid-East.
Bush is leading nobody to a better life. If we use his actions as an example, we will respond to people, with whom we disagree, with hatred and violence, and he tells us that if you think that you are right, you should kill to get your way. The people who support Bush in the U.S. do so for self-serving needs like low taxes, gun rights, anti-abortion laws (self-serving in that it imposes religious beliefs on others) , Bibles instead of science in school, and these supporters are easily lulled into believing whatever he says.
So my answer is that he is poised to attack again, and he will attack whoever he wants, whenever he feels like it by using the techniques described above.
Using Bush's words... don't "misunderestimate" his abiliy to make bad decisions.
You wacked out quasi-communist america hating liberal democrats really ebarass our country with your insane babbling.
--------------------------
There will be no ground war with Iran.
Most likely IF the time comes you will see early precision airial strikes by the US, supported by spec ops on the ground but overwhelming majority of the forces will be Iranians.
Before that point, putting Amerian soldiers in there would just put them in a situation where neither THEY nor the Iranian civilians would 'trust' each other. Much like Iraq. "Tolerate" but not help (at least not for a while) for whatever reason.
For that reason, and because there is a substantial 'sudent' and reform structure within Iran, I can say this with certainty.
Until then it will be diplomacy (letting the Brits/Germans/French learn for themselves what we have been saying about the intentions of the Mullahs)
The only other thing that would advance the timetable is a surgical airial strike on some Nuke facility, and that would be a hit and go... that is unless the Mullahs decide to do something like 'surpirse nuke' Israel in retaliation.
If that happens... all bets are off (and not becuase of the US at that point)
Post a Comment